Dan Winter
Dan Winter is an electrical engineer and a wonderful teacher, and highly capable of imparting new knowledge about building fractal electric fields which support self-organizing living spaces that radiate a life-giving charge. Dan provides insight into fractals and how they work, and explains what magnetic maps tell us about war or peace anywhere in the world.
We discuss the necessity of living architecture to well-being and a healthy immune system, the plasma universe, heart coherence, causes of gravitation that have never been understood, implosion water and its benefits, the causes and cures of desertification, and the importance of the golden ratio in living structures. What do fractals have to do with GMO foods and happy DNA? Why are living capacitors so important to life itself? Tune in and discover the Holy Grail of physics!
Listen using the player above, or: click here to download as a podcast
No related posts
{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
the theory of everything…..holy grail of physics can only be establish and true if and only if two things are study and that is TIME and SPACE…this is the vessel in which every theory of the universe are born….even Einstein theory of special relativity…….what i consider to be done as physicist is to study more on time and space with this every theory of the universe can be one……Time is the function of every things in the universe
there is a review of this .. chat / performance / chat .. peptalk … whateva … here:
messed on the title for it there also (grin):
http://indexterity.blogspot.com/2010/09/posted-stuff-from-10th-so-far-with-this.html
hint: i mean to defend Callahan here from the times Dan Winter doesn’t do him justice .. which luckily is not the case here. Well done.
Although Dan Winter did use a lot of scientific jargon to speak about fractal fields, it didn’t keep a lay person like myself from understanding or appreciating what he was talking about. I really got it!! I am so excited that I intend to learn more about it and apply the formula to my home environment The rainbow example was magnificent. The rainbow shows up in a fractal field and it is self organizing. The colors are sorted in layers. Brilliant! Thank you for another fantastic interview Kim!
Steven,
Most people can find faults or flaws in anyone, but I am interested in the truth and what benefits to others someone has to offer. Dan Winter’s interview gave me insights into some of the issues my Research and Development Company is working on. For this I am grateful to Mr. Winter and Kim Greenhouse. I appreciate the fact that Winter made comments about Einstein’s work which could have been stated with greater diplomacy. But I truly doubt if anyone would think any less of Einstein’s great body of work just because he wasn’t right all the time!
I was top of my class in my USC physics classes, but my high school physics classes(El Camino Real in Woodland Hills,Ca) were actually more difficult. From this perspective I believe that “high school physics level statements” are too complex for most people and that Mr. Winter is a bit difficult to understand without a thorough understanding of physics and math. I believe that Winter’s web site references with regards to the subjects he had barely enough time to cover would convince most people he knows his science. I found Winter’s interview to be very rewarding and it provided me with information to do further advanced research.
If you want something which is more digestible to the “lay person”, you may want to check out the many interviews and videos of David Sereda or Nassim Haramein.
However, with reference to a few top scientists I know, I have learned that their scientific veracity is not necessarily connected to their personality traits, casual comments and quirks. For example, you may find Sereda’s conversation with his dog in one of his videos to completely discredit him as to his scientific knowledge – just as you seemed to find Mr. Winter intolerable because of his comments about Einstein.
Is your definition of a “Real Scientist” only including people who never make unpopular statements or “childishly stupid” comments? If so, I know some so-called top scientists in their field who would lose their credibility. For instance, remember that MIT department head who made those cruel and personal attacks on National TV about by Martin Fleischmann, then one of the world’s leading chemists, and Stanley Pons. After his crude statements, this most respected MIT scientist maintained his own prestige in the scientific world. It is easy to make the error in critical thinking to generalize the validity of a person’s work based on your dislike of a person’s particulate attribute, action or statement. For instance, some might discount what you have said simply because you used the term, “bulls..t.” and “crap” in your posts.
Ionpropulsion
Bill, I stand by what I said. Sorry, but why would anyone pay me to discredit Dan when he does that so easily himself. I immediately lost respect for him with the “childishly stupid” reference to Einstein’s work. Real scientists don’t do that. As Einstein said himself when asked about his work. It went along the lines of this: “No one can ever prove that my theories are correct, but someone can prove they are wrong”.
Well no proof presented here by Dan, just a bunch of high school physics level statements about fractals and wave interference with no explanation for the lay person.
Steven,
Unless you are paid to make these comments in a lame attempt to discredit Dan Winter’s fine work, you might want to upgrade your education in science. For instance, you may want to study constructive versus destructive interference frequencies. Once you learn a little about basic scientific principles, you may get more out of this interview with Dan Winter.
As an admirer of Einstein, I recognize that no one is perfect and I am aware that some of his theories are not sacred truths. For instance, search for Dr. Thomas Van Flandern’s comments on Einstein’s theory about gravity. Einstein’s gravitation model is as well accepted by people today as was the “bleeding” medical treatment a few hundred years ago! Truth is not necessarily popular.
In the future, if you make further comments, it would be helpful to all if you made clear and factual praise or criticism instead of simply screaming out unsupported mockery.
Ionpropulsion
Dan Winter didn’t explain a single thing. All he did was say a whole of techno-babble rubbish that didn’t mean anything. eg As waves add and multiply recursively as they cross, blah blah and centrepedal force blah blah and wave velocity multiplies blah blah and hydrogen radii blah blah and that makes gravity blah blah blah and I wrote the equations to prove that blah blah – what bulls..t.
Referring to Einstein as “childishly stupid” is offensive as well. This site loses credibility putting this crap up.
For another approach to the “Theory of Everything”
Tom Campbell
The Monroe Institute Lecture:
http://vimeo.com/11005286
The Hawaii Seminar:
http://il.youtube.com/results?search_query=Thomas+Campbell+-+The+Hawaii+Seminar&aq=f