George Taylor
When one begins to examine climate science and politics, one awakens to the realization that there are essentially two types of climatologists: modelers (the simulators) and empiricists (the “data” people). These two camps examine data so differently that it is difficult to understand their views without knowing which method they use. This can drastically alter the information that is coming forth based on real or imagined / modeled data. Join us with George Taylor as we discuss the differences between the two camps, why they are so critical in understanding the data we receive from climatologists around the world, and why it is so important to separate apples and oranges in the context of the climate change debate.
Listen using the player above, or: click here to download as a podcast
- Climate Computer Modeling Problems & Distortions Dr. Nicolas Scafetta from Duke University identifies problems in current climate computer modeling and explains the sun's role in the climate system....
- The Science Isn’t Settled Energy Probe executive director Dr. Lawrence Solomon discusses consensus, science and his new book The Deniers....
- Critical Details About Climate Climate expert Joe D'Aleo of ICECAP.US discusses CO2 and his latest report with Anthony Watts called Surface Temperatures: A Policy-Driven Deception....
- The Solar Return Dr. Piet Martens discusses new tools for identifying and predicting solar storms, sunspots, coronal mass ejections, and other solar events that may threaten our electrical grid....
- A True Inquiry Into Climate & Weather (1/2): A Hot Potato Robert Felix, Dr. Tim Ball, & Joe D'Aleo guide us through ice ages, magnetic reversals, and more in this dialogue on weather & climate. Part 1 of 2....
