George Taylor
When one begins to examine climate science and politics, one awakens to the realization that there are essentially two types of climatologists: modelers (the simulators) and empiricists (the “data” people). These two camps examine data so differently that it is difficult to understand their views without knowing which method they use. This can drastically alter the information that is coming forth based on real or imagined / modeled data. Join us with George Taylor as we discuss the differences between the two camps, why they are so critical in understanding the data we receive from climatologists around the world, and why it is so important to separate apples and oranges in the context of the climate change debate.
Listen using the player above, or: click here to download as a podcast
- Related posts
- The Solar Return Dr. Piet Martens discusses new tools for identifying and predicting solar storms, sunspots, coronal mass ejections, and other solar events that may threaten our electrical grid....
- Climate Computer Modeling Problems & Distortions Dr. Nicolas Scafetta from Duke University identifies problems in current climate computer modeling and explains the sun's role in the climate system....
- Climate Change: The Whole Enchilada Since October 2009, It's Rainmaking Time!™ has been conducting a formal inquiry into the science and politics behind climate change. We invite you to trace our steps through this controversial topic....
- A True Inquiry Into Climate & Weather (2/2): The Plot Thickens Drs. Willie Soon & David Legates reveal startling information about the forces that influence climate & weather, and the political obstruction of science. Part 2 of 2....
- The Science Isn’t Settled Energy Probe executive director Dr. Lawrence Solomon discusses consensus, science and his new book The Deniers....
