Comments on: Sea Level Basics

By: seesoo1001

seesoo1001 — Sat, 03 Sep 2011 14:18:17 +0000

Подскажите кто-нибудь, где можно нормально скачать любые программы?

By: Thomas T S Watson

Thomas T S Watson — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:04:29 +0000

With a colleague, Dr Alberto Boretti from the Ballarat Uni, we have been peer reviewed. OK’d by them but not accepted by the editors. Why? It is my belief that the editors of some Australian Journals have invested interest from grants from the Governments, and this is why the public of Australia do not hear the truth about why this climate is changing.
Yes! We have had one paper approved showing that in New Zealand, their values of climate were desperately not accurate: “Is New Zealand Globally Warming” with the International Journal of Climate Change,, as are two states in Australia, namely Victoria and the Northern Territory.

Re the Ocean level status, it is the Tectonic plates that are rising and falling as they have been since time began, and I support Paul Star, for he has seen with his eyes and this is again supported with the CO2 observations from the Island of Hawaii showing Mount Kilauea reported as putting our 3,000 to 8,000 cubic Tonnes of CO2, per DAY. Is it not strange that just 35 Km away, there is a research station post on top of Mt Mauna Loa, This is the station that the IPCC used to claim that Humans were contributing to the CO2 increase. I wonder why?
We seem to be not aware that nature emits so much CO2 compared to the emissions of Humans. The actual life span of CO2 is four years and when activated by Infra Red from our Sun, has a recycled life span of 20 Milliseconds. Believe it or Not.
My book is still available….

By: aaron edwards

aaron edwards — Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:29:55 +0000

Dear Oh God;
Did you actually read the abstacts of any of the papers you cited? The last one you listed was:

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 36, L12607, 6 PP., 2009
doi:10.1029/2009GL038720
QUOTE:
“The sea level trends obtained in the ITRF2005 reference frame are more consistent than in the ITRF2000 or corrected for Glacial-Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) model predictions, both on the global and the regional scale, leading to a reconciled global rate of geocentric sea level rise of 1.61 ± 0.19mm/yr over the past century in good agreement with the most recent estimates.”

OK 1.61 mm per year = .161 cm per year, multiply times 100 years and you get 16 mm per century. Fairly close to the 15 cm per century measured by
Dr Nils-Axel Morner

By: andrew dunbar

andrew dunbar — Sun, 29 May 2011 12:35:30 +0000

Excellent interview, thorough concise and utterly eye opening. thank you very much.

By: pjpf

pjpf — Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:42:34 +0000

Dear Ms. Greenhouse,
I have listened to, and read most of the information on your web-site.

Being involved with environmental issues for the last 30 years, at senior level, I would like to say that you are just wonderful. You are a beacon of light for all of us out here, who have been unable to find answers to what we know is true. Please keep up the good work and many, many thanks for putting science back into the realm of ‘searching for the truth’.

By: Are the seas really rising? | Crowhill Weblog

Are the seas really rising? | Crowhill Weblog — Mon, 15 Nov 2010 01:40:47 +0000

[...] See Rise of sea levels is ‘the greatest lie ever told’, and if you have the time, listen to the interview on this page — Sea Level Basics. [...]

By: Jon

Jon — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:14:26 +0000

“Are you sad about what’s happening?” What a great follow-up question to his rambling nonsense answer about satellite altimeter readings which show rising trend.

By: spangled drongo

spangled drongo — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:29:18 +0000

Having assisted in preventing houses from being washed into the ocean [not always successfully] 50 years ago and being involved in sea-wall construction, I have benchmarks going back 47 years and they show that in my area, sea levels have fallen over that time by at least 20 cms [8 inches].
More recently by twice that amount but it will be interesting to check again at the next king tide of this current La Nina.

By: Paul Starr

Paul Starr — Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:42:03 +0000

You may be interested to know that when I was in Tongatapu in the middle of the Pacific Ocean not long ago, I made a study of their sea level to which the local museum was very helpful. The level there has dropped over 3 meters during the last 2000 years. It is also visibly obvious by the stranded rock coral formations. This fall in sea level has created a shallow lagoon which once served them well with a unique shell fish and with an abundance of other fish that was their main diet – today it has a muddy bottom and is a sad version of it’s former self. The locals, once strong and slim are today over weight and suffering from type 2 diabeties – they live on pig and chicken and receive reject meat from New Zealand in the form of 2 kilo cans of corned beef. Discusting stuff but the point is, all the South Pacific islands sit on top of volcanic mountains – these of course are on the move – pushing upward – it is not the sea that is falling but the land that is rising. After leaving Tonga a brand new island appeared. Too bad I missed out on seeing it. Google Underwater Volcano Tonga and see it for yourself.
BUT in conclusion, in all the places to which I travel and most recently Vanuatu and New Zealand, there are no signs at all of sea levels rising. It only exists in the minds of the Political Terrorists – The Greens and The Australian (Communist) Labor Party. BTW, did you know that solar power is sold to the grid and that this means an increase in the use of power FROM the grid ? It’s an observation that I have made. If you’de like me to explain why, please ask. cheers !

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:50:32 +0000

[...] been exaggerated. I would like to interview him myself to get the complete picture. Thankfully, someone else has interviewed him recently. It is an audio interview about an hour long. His analysis about a decade back indicated a sea [...]