
Gavin Menzies
Peer review was established to ensure quality and accuracy of academic research and publications. As one university library tells students,
“Peer review ensures that an article—and therefore the journal and the scholarship of the discipline as a whole—maintains a high standard of quality, accuracy, and academic integrity. When you consult peer-reviewed sources, you are tapping into a wealth of established, verified knowledge.”
Does this mean non-peer reviewed materials have no value? What happens if academics refuse to peer review? Are they the only arbiters of quality and accuracy?

Dr. Tim Ball
Few people outside of academia know what it is or how it operates. Like most ideas and methods, peer review has evolved from its original purpose in ways that academics never anticipated – for example, the scandals involving climate science and the perversion of scientific and academic method. While peer review has mostly been thought of as the way ideas get their credibility, in fact, peer review has become an incestuous system that often invites corruption and territoriality so that most of the realm of new discoveries can’t make their way to the world. The peer review process is often antithetical to innovation and perpetuates prevailing knowledge. We need a new and better process and paradigm because of the hugely important implications for the betterment of all of society.
Gavin Menzies, the author of 1421 and 1434 and Dr. Tim Ball, a climatologist, teacher, and writer from Canada, join us to lay out what we need to know about peer review to get us thinking about other ways of empowering discoveries throughout the modern world.
Listen using the player above, or: click here to download as a podcast
- Related posts
- Slaying the Sky Dragon Climatologist Dr. Tim Ball discusses his new book Slaying The Sky Dragon and explains why the greenhouse gas theory is just plain wrong....
- The Science Isn’t Settled Energy Probe executive director Dr. Lawrence Solomon discusses consensus, science and his new book The Deniers....
- What If Einstein Was Wrong? Dr. Pari Spolter explains how scientific dogma has hindered American energy independence and how she knows that academia continues to waste taxpayer money....
- The Complexity of Ocean Exploration Dr. Tim Ball returns for our 100th show since resuming production in late 2009. Join us as we discuss ocean exploration and the ocean's role in climate....
- Weather Forecasting Breakthrough Meteorologist and teacher Jim Witt explains his long range weather forecasting paradigm, which factors in the harmonics of the sun, moon, and planets. This segment is dedicated to Thomas James Witt....















{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Dear Ms Greenhouse
I stumbled upon your web site by following a link from Gavin Menzies’ site. I was quite impressed with the criticism of the practices of the IMF, but I then clicked on your climate link and listened to you interview with Dr Lawrence Solomon.
Please do not base your opinions on just one carefully crafted book followed by an unchallenged interview with the author. May I suggest a couple of web sites that argue global warming points cogently from a scientific standpoint. They are the rigorous http://www.realclimate.org and the more popular http://www.skepticalscience.com.
Enter Lawrence Solomon to search the RC site and you will find critiques of his book and many references to him where his claims are destroyed.
Keep up the GOOD work.
Mike Hughes
{ 1 trackback }