Robert Vicino – Underground Real Estate

by on September 27, 2010      

in Emergency & Disaster

Robert Vicino

Robert Vicino

With so many global concerns about end times, wars, 2012, solar flares, prophesies, and earth changes, some people around the earth are looking at the prospect of buying underground real estate to survive potential chaos and destruction in the future. Welcome to the world of underground real estate. Join us with Robert Vicino, the owner of the Vivos Underground Shelter Network.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Robir Datta September 27, 2010 at 8:30 am

Mr. Robert Vicino speaks of anarchy: however the term is inappropriate in the context.

Anarchy is the logical outcome of the of the non-aggression principle, the non-initiation of the use of force. It would be a most orderly society: chaos would not be any part of it.

Everyday Anarchy

Practical Anarchy

The Sunset of the State

Reply

2 michael farmer September 28, 2010 at 5:27 am

great presentation from vivos, it may be the best solution of our time, people are always in denial, however, ther are those few that except the real deal when they see it. great job, well done by vivos. the event will happen, and there is only so much room available.

mr farmer.

Reply

3 Last Word September 28, 2010 at 9:50 am

Robir: You are incorrect. Here is the definition of anarchy:

an·ar·chy   
[an-er-kee]
–noun
1.
a state of society without government or law.
2.
political and social disorder due to the absence of governmental control: The death of the king was followed by a year of anarchy.
3.
a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.
4.
confusion; chaos; disorder: Intellectual and moral anarchy followed his loss of faith.

Reply

4 Joe Leary September 28, 2010 at 2:30 pm

Last Word,

Actually, the idea that anarchy is inherently chaotic is suggested by corporate statists, who have historically funded and/or co-opted political anarchist movements in order to manipulate public opinion and create public precedent for anarchism, thus demonstrating a supposedly legitimate premise for extended control (totalitarianism).

The definition you have provided for anarchy encompasses two vastly different extremes – one of “disorder” (#4) and one of “organized society” (#3). Anarchy cannot fulfill both of these conditions.

For the record, the founding fathers’ original political model was a hair shy of anarchy. You can’t support their views without at least giving a nod to anarchy…

Reply

Leave a Comment